Skip to main content

Buddhism and the Myth of Rugged Individualism


In America, we have  a culture that is self-centered and individualistic.  We believe that each person must look out for their own self-interest, working to earn as much money as possible at the expense of others.  

Ideas like community and egalitarianism are looked down upon; replaced by a social Darwinism that insists only the fittest among us are worthy of food, water and shelter.

But this me-first mindset doesn't stop with finance and social programs.  It has burrowed into our Buddhist centers; coloring the ways in which we read scripture and teach the Dharma.  For example, take this quote from the Dhammapada

No one saves us but ourselves.
No one can and no one may.
We ourselves must walk the path:
Buddhas only show the way.

The first time I read this passage the message seemed clear.  I was responsible for my own actions, and if I I wanted to walk a spiritual path, I had to walk alone.  Many years later, I realize the first half of my statement is true, we are all responsible for our own actions. The second part, however, is misguided.

The problem comes in the last line of the verse, "Buddhas only show the way," which when read from the view point of an individualist suggests the Buddhas are largely uninvolved in our journey towards enlightenment.  But this isn't the case, rather the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas of this world are there every step of the way; supporting us in our journey.  Furthermore, it was plant Buddhas that taught me this lesson.

I grew a bush variety of yellow wax beans in my garden this year.  The plants were as close to identical as one can get; they were grown from seeds  that came from the same package, they were planted in the same soil, and they received equal amounts of sunshine and water each day.  They only meaningful difference between them was their location in the garden.

Several rows of beans were planted in a corner by themselves, and the rest were planted next to some Marigolds and Lavender flowers.

All of the bean plants grew as expected for about two months.  However, I noticed something interesting when they began producing fruit.  The bean bushes that were planted in the corner by themselves were slower to mature, and I harvested fewer beans from them.

However, the bean bushes that were planted near the flowers produced a surplus of food.  The latter was a good problem to have, but it warranted some investigation.  

So, I paid close attention while watering the garden, and I noticed that the Marigolds and Lavenders were attracting bees, which would then hop over to the bean bushes and pollinate their flowers.  

I'll be honest, I didn't know beans produced flowers until I planted my garden, but they do.  And if those flowers don't get pollinated, fewer beans get produced.  

I saw this firsthand in the bean bushes that I planted in the corner of my garden.  They lacked the additional support of other flowers beside their own.  So, they grew less food.

This experience showed me that while plants start off as rugged individuals, growing towards the sun via their own strength.  They require a relationship with the rest of the garden in order to produce fruit.

Humans operate in the same way, especially when we walk the Buddhist path.  We see this if we reread the passage from the Dhammapada with a focus on relationship instead of individuality.

No one saves us but ourselves.
No one can and no one may.
We ourselves must walk the path:
Buddhas only show the way.

The first three lines are reminding us that we are the gardeners of our own spiritual bean stalks.  We must plant the seeds and create the causes necessary for our own enlightenment to bloom.  No one can do this for us, we must take the first steps.

However, the final line is a reminder that the steps of our journey are not taken alone.  Once the beans are planted, once the flowers open, there will be Buddhas to direct our path; to push us over the edge to enlightenment.

These Buddhas take many forms as we go through our day.  They might be the barista who prepares our coffee, or the trash collector who hauls away our waste; making our lives easier in the process.  But even if we can't see the Buddhas who help us, they are always there.

And they pollinate us in the same way that bees pollinate flowers; ensuring that there's plenty of (spiritual) food for the harvest.  These relationships are the heart of Buddha Dharma, 

And as we grow in our faith, as our flowers explode with vibrant colors that reveal the Buddha within us, we carry on their work.  We pollinate the lives of the people around us through wisdom and compassion; beautifying the garden of our life.

Namu Amida Butsu


 If you enjoyed this essay, you'll love my book!





Buddhism and the Myth of Rugged Individualism

Comments

  1. Written with such heart my friend. That last paragraph misted these old eyes. Gassho,

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3 Universal Truths that Buddha Taught

Philosophers have wrestled with the concept of universal truth for centuries. But no one has been able to figure out exactly what it is, or even if it truly exists. In fact, the existentialist philosopher, Nietzsche famously threw up his hands and stated, " God is dead ," while contemplating the question. Of course, he wasn't claiming that a literal super natural deity had died. Rather, he was expressing the fact that human conceptual thought around things like happiness, goodness, truth, etc. is inherently flawed. As a result, universal truth as represented by God cannot exist. In Nietzsche's view, the best we can hope for is to live as individuals, constantly striving against one another to impose our will to power upon the world. The Buddhist view, however, is different. While Buddha would agree that humanity's conceptual view of the world is limited, he observed three experiences that all living beings share. These are often referre

Magic Mushrooms and the Buddha Dharma

You meet all kinds of people on the road.  Some of them are clearly running from something; a past trauma or an action they regret. Others are clearly looking for something; a tribe of like-minded people or a safe place to call home. This results in a strange mix of people ending up in strange places and sharing their lives for any where from a few weeks to a few months.   You part ways knowing that you'll never see each other again despite your endless promises to keep in touch.  But you always remember the people you meet on the road, and your life is usually better for having met them. Case in point, I met a guy named "Fred" when I was farming in Indiana who'd lived an insanely cool life.  He did corporate America for a while, and decided it wasn't for him.  So, he high-tailed it to Vietnam and taught English for several years before deciding that he wanted to become a shaman.  After that, he made his way to Brazil where he wandered fo

Buddhism and Anti-Natalism

David Benatar is the head of philosophy at Cape Town University and the author of Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence.   In his book, David argues that bringing new life into the world is an immoral act.  In order to make this argument he uses an axiological asymmetrical argument, which states: If a being exists, suffering is bad and pleasure is good.  However, if a being does not exist, missing out on pleasure isn't bad, however missing out on suffering is good.  In other words, life is suffering. Suffering is bad.  Therefore, it's better to not be born, so that we never experience suffering.  It's important to note, that Benatar does not include any caveats to this argument.   In fact, in this interview with Sam Harris, he suggests that there is no way to make a life good enough that it is better than not existing. Naturally, this view point has received pushback in the philosophy community.  For my part, I'd like to tackle Benatar's unde