Skip to main content

Hongaku- The Truth About Original Enlightenment

Hongaku is a Japanese word that translates to "original enlightenment".  This teaching, which states that all people, animals, and inanimate objects are already enlightened originated in medieval China, and first appears in the Avatamsaka (Flower Garland) Sutra.

The teaching became popular in Japan during the Kamakura period (1185-1333) appearing in the Platform Sutra of Huineng (The Sixth Patriarch).  

And while they expressed the teaching in different ways, prominent Buddhist teachers like Dogen (Soto Zen), Eissai (Rinzai Zen) and Shinran (Pureland Buddhism) made Hongaku a key part of their Buddhist doctrine.  

Despite this doctrinal backing, however, the teaching of original enlightenment is a hard pill for most people to swallow.  In my own experience, when I tell people that they're already enlightened they sometimes respond by either insisting they're a terrible person or saying something along the lines of, "Yeah, I know we're all "enlightened," but how do I get ENLIGHTENED."  The implication, of course, is that everyone is equal, but some people are more equal than others.

The end result of this flawed thinking is that Buddhist practice becomes a cheap status symbol.  The only difference is that instead of competing with our neighbor based on our car or bank account, we compete on the basis of awakening.  Questions like who's been practicing longer, who has the most impressive lineage, and who can sit in a full-lotus are all common inquiries in the, "Who's more enlightened?" game that plays out on-line and in sanghas across the United States.

A good understanding of Hongaku serves to stop all of this.  It teaches us that the purpose of practice isn't to become spiritual super people.  Rather, it's to remind us of our already enlightened nature.

Of course, this begs the question, "If we're already enlightened, why do we need to practice Buddhism?"  An easy way to think of it is to imagine that our enlightenment is a beautiful, sunshine-filled day and our mind is a window that collects dust.

The sun is always shining, but if we want sunlight to come into our homes, we need to make sure that our windows are clean.  Otherwise, the dust-covered windows won't allow any light to enter the house.  Similarly, our enlightenment is always present, but if our minds are filled with delusions, that enlightenment can't manifest in our daily lives.

This is why meditating and keeping the precepts are so important.  These practices clean our window-minds and allow our enlightenment to enter the world.

This is a beautiful, empowering teaching that can benefit many people.  Unfortunately, it's also an insulting teaching if we approach it with a mind of delusion.  It tells us that criminals are enlightened just like saints.  And it implies that we can adhere to every syllable of the teachings without gaining anything permanent or lasting.

This is a problem because the deluded mind needs to feel special in a way that others aren't.  And if everyone is enlightened, then enlightenment stops being special.  But this is only a problem for the deluded mind.  In fact, the three teachers that I mentioned earlier all encouraged their students to treat the practice as "nothing special."

Dogen went so far as to say the act of seated meditation was enlightenment itself.  And Shinran stated that we only need to place our faith in Amida (The Buddha of Infinite Light) in order to reach the Buddhist Pureland.  Thus enlightenment stops being a question of attainment.  Instead it's a simple question of practice.  And if we practice enlightened behavior, we'll return to our true nature, which is already enlightened.

So let's practice hard, my friends, and let our enlightened natures shine!

Namu Amida Butsu

Get my new book, Perfectly Ordinary: Buddhist Teachings for Everyday Life

Click here to read a free sample chapter of the book

Visit my YouTube channel to hear Dharma Talks!

If you'd like to support my work, please consider making a donation.

Hongaku- The Truth About Original Enlightenment


  1. This is an excellent article. Excellent. I have Buddhists tell me all the time that, since we are already enlightened, we can sit in front of the TV all day watching football and there is nothing more to do. Original Enlightenment is one of the hardest doctrines to understand, but you have summed it up perfectly. I am going to share this on other Buddhist sites.

  2. I hope this doesn't come across as critical, as that's not how I mean it. How is this teaching considered "Buddhist" when it came about well after the Buddha taught? To the best of my knowledge, the Buddha never hinted at the notion that all beings are fundamentally enlightened.

  3. I've never practiced not am I Buddhist, but I am intrigued. To me it makes sense that we are part of the whole (light), and we must remember by the practice that we have always been in the light and the light is indeed us. I guess people forget to be quiet and enjoy just being, remembering our origin. I don't know if it makes sense, but I feel it inside myself and it is ok for me.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Buddhism and Anti-Natalism

David Benatar is the head of philosophy at Cape Town University and the author of Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence.   In his book, David argues that bringing new life into the world is an immoral act.  In order to make this argument he uses an axiological asymmetrical argument, which states: If a being exists, suffering is bad and pleasure is good.  However, if a being does not exist, missing out on pleasure isn't bad, however missing out on suffering is good.  In other words, life is suffering. Suffering is bad.  Therefore, it's better to not be born, so that we never experience suffering.  It's important to note, that Benatar does not include any caveats to this argument.   In fact, in this interview with Sam Harris, he suggests that there is no way to make a life good enough that it is better than not existing. Naturally, this view point has received pushback in the philosophy community.  For my part, I'd like to tackle Benatar's unde

Rescue Me From Hell

As a child, I became well-versed in the concept of hell.  It was an important part of my training in the Christian, evangelical church.  After all, how could I be a good emissary for the lord if I didn't know what was at stake.   Yes, church picnics and bible camps were fun, but they were also superfluous.  The purpose of Christianity wasn't to help me sell cookies at the church bake sale.  Rather, it was to protect me from an eternity of hellfire and torment   The rules were simple. I had to accept Jesus as my lord and savior, attend church regularly, and pay my tithes.  To do anything less would result in punishment as shown in John 3:16 and John 3:36: (16) For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. (36) The one who believes in the Son has eternal life. The one who rejects the Son will not see life, but God’s wrath remains on him. Just as as a loving parent will punish thei

The Enlightenment Scam

When I started practicing Buddhism, I had one goal.  I wanted to attain enlightenment.  I wanted the spiritual maturity, unshakable confidence, and endless calm that I envisioned the Buddha having 2,600 years ago.   I spent endless hours scouring the internet, and pouring through books in search of a Buddhist school to dedicate myself too.  Eventually, I settled on Zen because it seemed like the most direct, no-nonsense approach.   I practiced faithfully for several years, and I slowly started to make progress.  My mind became calmer, my heart became gentler, and the world didn't seem like such a dark place.  But I didn't feel any closer to enlightenment.   Then I heard the practice described as walking through a fog , and suddenly realizing that you're soaking wet.  That seemed logical.  Buddha practiced for 6 years before having his awakening under the Bodhi tree, so why should I be any different?  I just needed to sit, and keep sitting until something &quo